Neither Islam, Nor
Against Both Islamism And Zionism
Dr. Jim Saleam
is an edited of an address given to the 2011
My address today is one that asks you to think to grasp ideas hidden by fog. My address is one of lateral thinking. And I aim to incite questions.
After the fall of communism, the western elites, those concealed rulers of our world, were sure of their ultimate triumph. There seemed no competitors – even unappetising ones. They wanted to extend the boundaries of the market empire, to destroy all cultures, to create economic man, that bio cog in a vast machine of trade and commerce. Super-profits forever, nirvana –the New World Order.
But there was still a number of hold out societies.
The globalisers had played with Islamic
radicals in the 1980’s when they funded them to fight the Soviet Union in
So against the
And the opportunity! The existence of this new enemy gave the free
market empire, this New World Order, a chance to interfere in the Islamic
world. To break it open as a market. To seize its oil. To serve
In the 1990’s, elite academic and opinion-maker forces identified a new
enemy for the democratic globalisers – it was
Islamism. Sometimes they called it Islamo-fascism
because it was violent and it disliked
The world was set for the war on terror. When the system decided that, it simply needed all sorts of political allies and dupes. It had to convince wide sections of society that such a war was good. It had to create a false politics to get us to fight the Islamists.
The people here, in part, not completely of course, belong to a type of would-be pro Australian political camp. We are not internationalists. We are like others in many countries who’d like to put their own people first. We tend to be a little suspicious of those who come to a society and then work against it (as the Islamists do). So, finally, we also became one target-market to be (hopefully) co-opted into the evolving system of the New World Order and its plans for war.
Is Islamism A Problem For
Islamism is a problem for
What is interesting and is a contradiction as big as the
proverbial elephant in the room, is that our establishment – which is pro
Whatever views the Zionists might have is suspicious, but it hardly precludes the thesis that Islamism is a threat to Australians. But what sort of threat?
Islamism is paraded in our media as a threat to the position of
Once again, I
think that Islamism is a threat to
I think there is evidence of something else.
An official Taliban publication warns
"The end of European leadership in the world will place the white settler diaspora in
cheerfully warns, a lengthy conflict will ensue in which
"There is no doubt that the huge growth in the
population of Asia, together with its economic and military development,
So I can’t abide Islamism. Yet, I won’t advocate that we support those
who wish to attack Moslem countries, because it should already be clear that these folks have another agenda.
The question arises: how was it that anyone of a patriotic disposition could
become convinced that
What Is Zionism?
Zionism is an ideology, designed by certain Jews, that justifies the
Zionism is a part of Western elite politics. Its madness is considered normal by western liberals. These
Zionists may be racist, murderous, genocidal, be just
like Hitler was said to be – but are seen as liberal and humanistic and
essential allies by western elites. Supporting
The Big Takeover
I said before that the nationalist groups found themselves targeted for co-ordination for the war on terror.
I will now speak specifically.
In the 1990’s a series of parties emerged in many European (I don’t just
mean European continent) countries. They were in favour of national preference
over immigrants, wanted more democracy, were for free enterprise but protection
of old industries and the jobs of locals and the well being of pensioners and
so on. In
These parties offered no real ethnic definition of European-ness, nor did they seek to leave either NATO or the world economic order. They offered no real sense of political change, but were a protest against the elites. You might say they were feel-good sort of parties that offered a voting alternative to people. Under the right sort of leadership they could be taken in other and shall we say – more radical – directions. But someone else was looking too.
And here we see a paradox, as big as that elephant again. Most of us are not supporters of these hedonistic these I mentioned that define Western liberalism. We live better lives. So the establishment said: you look a little more conservative, so we’ll re-craft that for you with our Neo-Conservative ideology inspiring us at the heights and you can play politics down below with that as our basic ideals permeate your brain. So you serve without even being aware that you serve.
Neo-conservatism arose everywhere in one way or another from the early 1990’s and finally took office with George Bush and John Howard. And a swathe of groups became loyal followers of the regime without knowing it.
The model what was had occurred in
A man called Gianfranco Fini said that the MSI
needed to become modern, the old thrown out the door. Things tailored to the
public and not with esoteric messages. There’d be no more criticism of New
World Order capital and there’d be support for
In 1999 the British National Party was taken over. Nick Griffin said
that if this party became more modern, more ‘mainstream’ in its approach, it
would become a mass party. It had to get rid of jarring people and racist ideas
and anti capitalist ideas and embraced
After 2003 the Austrian Freedom Party was split. Leader Haider was pushed aside as the party joined the government
of the Christian Democrats. They had to swear not to seek to reverse
immigration, or the EEC They did nothing. The CD’s wore them out. And last
December they went to
Eventually, all these parties became horses for courses. If circumstances warranted, they were religious – on the other occasions, liberal.
The key point was Islamic immigration which they were critical of (but
like the system they basically wanted to integrate them!! WTF?)
and the reality of world politics was
It got very dirty. Friends were turned against each other and groups divided.
The same line appeared here. The mainstream is yours if you see Moslems
under the bed and praise
I contributed to a booklet: The Liberal Party And Its Satellites. I commend it. The groups that adopted the anti Islamist ideology looked to the Liberal Party as some sort of source-pool for members, alliances, support, whatever. The Liberals could hold out the idea that they might become really hard men like the satellite group. There are no end to these anti Islamist groups here – from the Q Society to the Australian Protectionists.
Weakness of ideological position allowed the takeover. The softer the
original line, the easier it was for the takeover by this alien line that would
tie a whole generation of popular protest and embryonic nationalism – to the
establishment with its evil plans for war. Like for the two trillion dollars
worth of rare minerals in
Storm In Tea Cup Or Major Factor?
An Australian historian called Mosler wrote:
“History . . . to Australians is something that happens to someone else
in a faraway lands and cultures. The cosmology of Australians is benign; they
will be able to engage in a life of endless recreation and pleasure, for wars,
revolutions, violence and social conflict do not happen in or to
No history happens and can happen here. In a way, the neo-cons have helped to bring it here – no less than any other number of woes imposed upon our country.
The contention of Islamism and Zionism shows us that we can and we should take the hazard of Australian independence, the forbidden idea.
I am one of those who demands an independent nationalist politics to create a nation-wide nationalist party. In deciding upon foreign policy we can see that Islamism presents a certain threat and Zionism because of its internal influence, another type of threat.
Neutrality doesn’t mean ignoring. It means taking a position of
neutrality by excluding both, curbing both and by correcting problems so
neutrality can be maintained. That is why we say neither
I will take your questions.